Asked by
Odysseus
Bo - Lead Developer and Tesla owner: bo@abetterrouteplanner.com
Jason - New Car Models, Developer and Bolt owner : jason@abetterrouteplanner.com
Idreams - Forums Administrator, Forums Developer and Tesla owner : idreams@abetterrouteplanner.com
Here is my issue. I have a 2017 Tesla S100D. I tested ABRP for accuracy on a route I drove regularly. ABRP has a default RC number for this car of 324. Using that and putting in my actual driving speed, 10 mph over the posted limit which is about 114%, a BRP pretty accurately reported that I would arrive with 15% left. That's very Close to what I actually experience on this drive which I have done probably 100 times [182 miles, 6400" vertical climb].
I found this website https://ev-database.org/cheatsheet/energy-consumption-electric-car which gives RC's for all electric cars I input the number for my Tesla, 162, into ABRP and it said I would arrive with 49% capacity, which is absurd.
I'm looking to buy a Taycan 4S with the 93kW battery and drive it from Arizona to Indiana, 1492 miles. ABRP says this will take 27 hours and require 15 charging stops using the default reference consumption number. When I change this to the cheat sheet referenced charge number obtained from the above website, it takes five hours off the total time and cuts the number of charge stops from 15 to 7!
Link to comment
Share on other sites