caf Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 Description: This plan results in "No valid plan found", but the best attempt plan routes right past a Supercharger. Adding that Supercharger as a manual waypoint results in a working plan. Alternately, selecting the begin navigation option on the "best attempt" plan results in it advising that a faster alternate plan is available. Type: Webpage Link to Plan: https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=56943e59-bab5-408b-9f5a-33704b944c79 https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=56943e59-bab5-408b-9f5a-33704b944c79https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=56943e59-bab5-408b-9f5a-33704b944c79 Replication Steps: This should be replicable just from the plan linked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katya-ABRP Posted December 2, 2020 Share Posted December 2, 2020 Hi @caf, May have been a temporary glitch. The link makes a valid route now by including the supercharger in Goulburn, was it perhaps this one it drove past previously? /Katya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caf Posted December 2, 2020 Author Share Posted December 2, 2020 10 hours ago, Katya (ABRP) said: Hi @caf, May have been a temporary glitch. The link makes a valid route now by including the supercharger in Goulburn, was it perhaps this one it drove past previously? /Katya Hi @Katya (ABRP), Yes, that is the supercharger it routes past. I am still seeing the same problem though when planning that route - I have attached a screenshot showing what I get when I try that plan. - caf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katya-ABRP Posted December 3, 2020 Share Posted December 3, 2020 Hi @caf, I've now taken a look at the plan with your actual user settings. It seems one parameter wasn't included in the link provided in this thread. The extra weight made it so that the consumption was high enough for the planner to decide that it would need to stop to charge if going with the first route while without extra weight it tried to decrease speed and did make a suggestion (as in your screenshot), however the only available suggestion would have you arrive at the final destination with a bit lower SoC than allowed. Basically, this is a niche case but it is of course confusing. We'll look into how we can improve this. /Katya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
