Jojo Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 Description: Blue dot in graph is not on the blue line. Should it be like that? Type: Using Model 3 browser 2020.12.5. Software. Link to Plan: Graph display during driving. I assume, the graph shows the estimated SOC in blue. The blue dot should be the current estimated SOC. But it is not on the blue line. It is shown somewhere else under the blue line. Second: What is the meaning of Nord (German), North (english?) under map mode. "Nächster Schritt" (ger)/"next step", "Ziel" (ger)/"Destination?" shows a specific area of the planned route. "nord"/"north" shows the current position in the middle of the screen. All three are oriented north. Shouldn't be "Nord" named "position centered"? Shouldn't there be a fourth button about map orientation toggle, which is valid for all three map areas shown (Nächster Schritt/Ziel/Centered)? It's confusing currently. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jojo Posted April 24, 2020 Author Share Posted April 24, 2020 Hello Here a picture from the blue dot somewhere in the graph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason-ABRP Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 Yeah, the blue dot is a bug right now, fixed in the next release. We have big updates to the charts coming soon to add some clarification and neat features while driving, so keep your eyes out for it! As far as the map mode buttons, our translations are open source, so if you have suggestions feel free to submit them to our GitHub repository: https://github.com/iternio/abrp-translations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomTomZoe Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 (edited) Oh, I thought the blue dot is not a bug but a feature . Now I remember the behaviour in the old version: The blue dot should walk on the the blue line. Edited April 24, 2020 by TomTomZoe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jojo Posted April 24, 2020 Author Share Posted April 24, 2020 Yes, I thought the same. But I couldn't figure out what purpose it should have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomTomZoe Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 @Jojo, die unterschiedlichen Darstellungen der Karte kommen hauptsächlich dann zum Tragen, wenn man mindestens ein Zwischenziel anfährt. Dann kann man nämlich einstellen, ob die Karte nur bis zum Zwischenziel angezeigt werden soll ("Nächster Schritt"), oder bis zum Gesamtziel der Reise ("Ziel"). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jojo Posted April 24, 2020 Author Share Posted April 24, 2020 Hallo Ja, das ist mir klar. Ich finde nur, dass hier zwei Dinge vermischt werden. Das eine ist der gezeigte Kartenausschnitt. - Standpunkt in der Mitte mit Umgebung (Centered) - Route mit Standpunkt und nächstem Zwischenziel - Gesamtroute Das andere ist die Orientierung der Ansicht. Theoretisch kann ich alle drei genordet oder in Fahrtrichtung orientiert anschauen. Ich würde vorschlagen: Ein Toggle Button für die drei Kartenausschnitte. Standardorientierung: Centered Fahrtrichtung, dazu in der Karte ein Toggle für genordet und 3D Nächster Schritt genordet, keine Toggles Ziel genordet, keine Toggles Eigentlich so, wie in den meisten Kartenanwendungen auch. Gruß Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomTomZoe Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 Ja, die fünf Ansichten machen so noch mehr Sinn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANBO Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 17 hours ago, Jason (ABRP) said: Yeah, the blue dot is a bug right now, fixed in the next release. We have big updates to the charts coming soon to add some clarification and neat features while driving, so keep your eyes out for it! As far as the map mode buttons, our translations are open source, so if you have suggestions feel free to submit them to our GitHub repository: https://github.com/iternio/abrp-translations Hi Jason, Would you be adding a secondary UOM for the height graph, to show absolute height? Living in Switzerland, the relative height can be very misleading as demonstrated in the attachments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason-ABRP Posted April 29, 2020 Share Posted April 29, 2020 On 4/25/2020 at 4:48 AM, ANBO said: Hi Jason, Would you be adding a secondary UOM for the height graph, to show absolute height? Living in Switzerland, the relative height can be very misleading as demonstrated in the attachments. This is in work, coming soon! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANBO Posted May 24, 2020 Share Posted May 24, 2020 Looks great. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motoqtreiber Posted March 7, 2021 Share Posted March 7, 2021 (edited) Somehow the ABRP burndown makes no sense or I don t understand it. what is the grey area and percentage? Amount of power used? The percentage has nothing to do with the SOC of my car. SOC that is correctly shown somewhere else in ABRP, so it knows it. I like the black charts. Edited March 7, 2021 by motoqtreiber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomTomZoe Posted March 7, 2021 Share Posted March 7, 2021 (edited) The gray area is the course of the elevation profile, second y-axis. Percentage ist the estimated/calculated SOC. Edited March 7, 2021 by TomTomZoe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
