caf Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 Some comparisons of actual consumption versus driving the plan in a Model 3 Standard Range Plus from the weekend: https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=d9564f61-cb89-448f-90f6-47dccc63cc75 (Plan says 35%, actual arrival SOC was 30%) https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=faf568fb-4cbf-4035-ab02-6a433f8b9848 (Plan says 37%, actual arrival SOC was 28%). What is the baseline for the "extra weight" - one driver, no luggage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason-ABRP Posted December 11, 2019 Share Posted December 11, 2019 Extra weight assumes nothing but the car. Driver should be negligible for normal planning, but when you start adding luggage and many riders you should add an approximate value for all of the extra weight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caf Posted December 17, 2019 Author Share Posted December 17, 2019 @Jason (ABRP) Ahh great, thanks. I believe I found the reason for the optimistic plans above too - there was a 15km section where with an assumed speed limit of 50km/h but the actual speed limit is 100km/h. I've fixed this in OSM so I'll see how it looks after ABRP does its next map refresh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason-ABRP Posted December 26, 2019 Share Posted December 26, 2019 On 12/16/2019 at 10:42 PM, caf said: @Jason (ABRP) Ahh great, thanks. I believe I found the reason for the optimistic plans above too - there was a 15km section where with an assumed speed limit of 50km/h but the actual speed limit is 100km/h. I've fixed this in OSM so I'll see how it looks after ABRP does its next map refresh! Perfect, that's the best solution! We typically re-import and re-cook the maps every week, so it should be updated now, let me know if that's solved the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
