caf

Description: Regeneration can predict SOC going above 100%. Type: Webpage Link to Plan: Not a bug in finding a route. Replication Steps: Plan a route starting somewhere with high altitude, starting at 100% SOC (I found this using the Tesla Model 3 2018-2020 Standard Range Plus RWD model). Examine route chart - you will see SOC climb above 100%, meaning that final predicted number is incorrect. Since it allows regeneration at 100%, it seems like it likely also isn't taking into account reduced regeneration at high SOC at all?

They have now returned, thanks ?

Ping @Katya (ABRP), these chargers are still missing.

Most of the Evie sites from @chuq's spreadsheet are not appearing in ABRP at the moment for some reason (I noticed Avenel, Tarcutta, Seven Hills, Taree and Coochin Creek at least are missing).

It does now. Previously the first link would take the route that is now shown as an alternate with +9 min.

Description: This simple route finds a significantly faster routing if you add a waypoint. Type: Webpage Link to Plan: The basic plan, no waypoint, 2h16m: https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=ee41dd91-51ac-4417-aa88-cbc756e78b03 After adding a waypoint at Merriwa, the plan improves to 2h7m: https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=a3c82672-e44f-4f51-8103-7d7cb546d740 Replication Steps: This is entirely replicated by using the given routings.

@chuq You might want to change Chargefox Shell Cove to an unavailable status, it's been down for months with no sign of a resolution and is back to "Coming Soon" status in Plugshare.

Hi @Katya (ABRP), Yes, that is the supercharger it routes past. I am still seeing the same problem though when planning that route - I have attached a screenshot showing what I get when I try that plan. - caf

Description: This plan results in "No valid plan found", but the best attempt plan routes right past a Supercharger. Adding that Supercharger as a manual waypoint results in a working plan. Alternately, selecting the begin navigation option on the "best attempt" plan results in it advising that a faster alternate plan is available. Type: Webpage Link to Plan: https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=56943e59-bab5-408b-9f5a-33704b944c79 https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=56943e59-bab5-408b-9f5a-33704b944c79https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=56943e59-bab5-408b-9f5a-33704b944c79 Replication Steps: This should be replicable just from the plan linked.

Hey @chuq, @Katya (ABRP) "56P532" is just the Clipsal product name (it's from their product line called the "56 Series"). The generic name for these is AS/NZS 3123 sockets (a standard which includes both single and three phase sockets and a range of current ratings). AS being "Australian Standard" and NZS being "New Zealand Standard". They're fairly common, and in remote areas are likely to be your best option for charging.

Now it seems that the NRMA charger there has disappeared. Incorrectly detected by ABRP as a duplicate?

Yeah ABRP needs those AC charging locations to be added to make it most useful in remote areas of Australia.

I suspect you can get this effect by setting the 'avoid this charger' option on each charger near the route?

Yeah OpenChargeMap seems like a black hole to me. You submit data but nothing ever happens. I don't know why chargers aren't just added to OpenStreetMap directly, I don't see the value in another layer there, particularly one with such a gatekeeping attitude.

@Bo (ABRP) There's reports that Tesla Superchargers in Europe aren't doing more than 120KW at the moment ( https://insideevs.com/news/437810/tesla-limiting-supercharging-120-kw-europe/ ) - I was curious if this is visible in ABRP data?